PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCRZX vs. PRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCRZX having a 18.68% return and PRSVX slightly higher at 19.53%. Over the past 10 years, SCRZX has underperformed PRSVX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PRSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.


SCRZX

1D
-1.14%
1M
4.37%
YTD
18.68%
6M
15.61%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.34%

PRSVX

1D
-0.50%
1M
4.10%
YTD
19.53%
6M
17.24%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCRZX
AB Small Cap Core Portfolio
18.68%7.75%7.72%20.91%-18.89%23.27%12.41%24.28%-13.25%7.40%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
19.53%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SCRZX and PRSVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.96

The correlation between SCRZX and PRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCRZX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCRZX
SCRZX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SCRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCRZXPRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.90

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

14.58

-2.47

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the PRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCRZX and PRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCRZX drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRZX and PRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCRZXPRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.82%

-55.37%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.37%

-8.93%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-24.60%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-28.17%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.82%

-40.97%

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.50%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-7.48%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.37%

+0.36%

Volatility

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison

AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) at 5.25%. This indicates that SCRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCRZXPRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.25%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

12.40%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

17.11%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

19.83%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

21.04%

+2.20%

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCRZX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCRZX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison

SCRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, less than PRSVX's 9.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
9.90%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%
SCRZX
AB Small Cap Core Portfolio
9.05%10.74%15.00%8.51%8.47%5.95%0.51%0.47%8.63%6.37%0.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SCRZX and PRSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCRZX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to PRSVX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRZX dropped -44.82% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.

PRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCRZX and PRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer