PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCRD vs. VNLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCRD vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCRD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 1.43% return.


SCRD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

VNLA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCRD vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.24%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
1.43%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.17%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SCRD and VNLA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.45

The correlation between SCRD and VNLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCRD vs. VNLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCRD
VNLA

Financial Services

25.0%

-

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Industrials

8.2%
33.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Real Estate

5.8%

-

Technology

4.5%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Energy

2.3%
66.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Financial Services

SCRD
25.0%
VNLA

-

Healthcare

SCRD
12.5%
VNLA

-

Industrials

SCRD
8.2%
VNLA
33.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCRD
6.6%
VNLA

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCRD
5.9%
VNLA

-

Real Estate

SCRD
5.8%
VNLA

-

Technology

SCRD
4.5%
VNLA

-

Communication Services

SCRD
2.4%
VNLA

-

Energy

SCRD
2.3%
VNLA
66.7%

Basic Materials

SCRD
2.2%
VNLA

-

Utilities

SCRD
1.9%
VNLA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCRD vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCRD
SCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCRD vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCRDVNLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

3.58

-2.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

11.15

-8.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

57.27

-49.64

SCRD vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCRD and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCRDVNLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

7.55

-5.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

2.10

-2.08

Drawdowns

SCRD vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCRD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than VNLA's maximum drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRD and VNLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCRDVNLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-4.49%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-0.43%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-0.49%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.02%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-0.23%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.08%

+0.74%

Volatility

SCRD vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.18%. This indicates that SCRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCRDVNLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.18%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

0.46%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

0.63%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

1.04%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

1.42%

+4.90%

SCRD vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCRD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCRD vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

SCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than VNLA's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.78%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCRD and VNLA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCRD has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRD dropped -21.17% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

On 3-year performance, VNLA leads with 5.76% vs 5.54% for SCRD. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 5.76% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SCRD.

SCRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.78% for VNLA.

SCRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VNLA is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCRD and 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCRD and VNLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer