PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCRD vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCRD vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCRD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 0.99% return.


SCRD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

VCLT

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.49%
YTD
0.99%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCRD vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.24%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.99%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SCRD and VCLT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.93

The correlation between SCRD and VCLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCRD vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCRD
SCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCRD vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCRDVCLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.47

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

3.62

+4.01

SCRD vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCRD and VCLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCRDVCLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.97

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.39

-0.37

Drawdowns

SCRD vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCRD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRD and VCLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCRDVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-34.31%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-5.25%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-13.03%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-14.36%

+13.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-8.16%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.13%

-1.31%

Volatility

SCRD vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) is 1.25%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that SCRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCRDVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

2.31%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

5.75%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

7.92%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

12.78%

-6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

12.84%

-6.52%

SCRD vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCRD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCRD vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

SCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than VCLT's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCRD and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCLT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to SCRD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRD dropped -21.17% vs VCLT's -34.31%.

On 3-year performance, SCRD leads with 5.54% vs 4.34% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCRD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCRD has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SCRD.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 5.44% for SCRD.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCRD and 0.04% for VCLT.

SCRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCRD and VCLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer