SCOBX vs. FAOSX
SCOBX (DWS International Growth Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SCOBX returned 2.79%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCOBX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOBX
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.02%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCOBX DWS International Growth Fund | 5.96% | 19.45% | 9.37% | 15.76% | -29.24% | 8.23% | 22.49% | 31.61% | -16.88% | 22.07% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOBX and FAOSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCOBX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOBX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
SCOBX
FAOSX
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCOBX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.09 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | -0.14 | +4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOBX drawdown since its inception was -62.65%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOBX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOBX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.65% | -36.24% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -7.26% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | -13.96% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.92% | -36.24% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -5.86% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -7.92% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 4.15% | -0.70% |
Volatility
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SCOBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOBX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 0.00% | +6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 3.63% | +10.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 8.75% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 16.71% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 16.64% | +0.87% |
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOBX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOBX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
SCOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCOBX DWS International Growth Fund | 4.44% | 4.70% | 3.37% | 1.57% | 3.78% | 3.70% | 0.81% | 1.01% | 1.29% | 0.46% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOBX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCOBX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCOBX dropped -62.65% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
SCOBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCOBX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer