PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOBX vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCOBX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than AAAZX's 10.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCOBX having a 7.63% annualized return and AAAZX not far behind at 7.49%.


SCOBX

1D
0.19%
1M
6.25%
YTD
8.60%
6M
10.16%
1Y
15.82%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
7.63%

AAAZX

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.27%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
7.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCOBX
DWS International Growth Fund
8.60%19.45%9.37%15.76%-29.24%8.23%22.49%31.61%-16.88%25.45%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
10.77%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-5.05%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCOBX and AAAZX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between SCOBX and AAAZX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOBX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCOBX
SCOBX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SCOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SCOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCOBXAAAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.99

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

10.95

-6.35

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCOBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCOBX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOBXAAAZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.88

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.44

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.40

+0.04

Drawdowns

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOBX drawdown since its inception was -62.65%, which is greater than AAAZX's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOBX and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOBXAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.65%

-40.45%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-5.68%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.86%

-10.15%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.92%

-22.52%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.92%

-29.44%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.73%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-6.62%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.54%

+1.88%

Volatility

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.53%. This indicates that SCOBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOBXAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

2.53%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

7.32%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

9.03%

+6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

12.14%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

12.71%

+4.81%

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOBX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOBX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SCOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than AAAZX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
3.74%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
SCOBX
DWS International Growth Fund
4.33%4.70%3.37%1.57%3.78%3.70%0.81%1.01%1.29%0.46%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCOBX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCOBX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to AAAZX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCOBX dropped -62.65% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOBX and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer