PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMBX vs. BATVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMBX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than BATVX's 0.97% return.


SCMBX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.95%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.88%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
1.82%

BATVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
1.64%3.21%2.52%6.64%-12.83%1.13%
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
0.97%2.80%2.48%1.41%-0.10%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMBX and BATVX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMBX vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMBX
SCMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SCMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BATVX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCMBXBATVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the BATVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMBX and BATVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMBXBATVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

3.57

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

2.39

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

2.38

-1.11

Drawdowns

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMBX drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMBX and BATVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMBXBATVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-0.20%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

0.00%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-0.10%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-0.20%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-0.03%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.00%

+0.89%

Volatility

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.20%. This indicates that SCMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMBXBATVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.20%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

0.49%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

0.73%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

0.64%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.32%

0.63%

+3.69%

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMBX vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison

SCMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than BATVX's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
2.55%2.76%2.44%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
3.74%4.46%3.49%2.64%2.36%3.27%3.57%4.32%3.42%3.31%3.87%3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCMBX and BATVX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMBX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMBX dropped -18.17% vs BATVX's -0.20%.

BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMBX and BATVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer