PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMAX vs. DFSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Massachusetts Tax Free Fund (SCMAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMAX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMAX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.


SCMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.51%

DFSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.17%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*
1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCMAX
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free Fund
1.38%3.28%1.32%5.24%-11.25%0.72%5.08%8.08%0.37%4.96%
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.95%2.30%2.84%2.98%-0.36%-0.11%0.83%1.62%1.22%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMAX and DFSMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2002

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between SCMAX and DFSMX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMAX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMAX
SCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSMX
DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Massachusetts Tax Free Fund (SCMAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCMAXDFSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

4.16

-1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

8.56

-4.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

4.46

-2.81

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

12.82

-10.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.77

77.17

-68.40

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMAX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMAXDFSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

4.16

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

2.18

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.64

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.79

-0.55

Drawdowns

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMAX and DFSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMAXDFSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-2.66%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.20%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

-0.49%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.28%

-1.66%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.28%

-1.69%

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

0.00%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-0.23%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.03%

+0.73%

Volatility

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Massachusetts Tax Free Fund (SCMAX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.14%. This indicates that SCMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMAXDFSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.14%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

0.37%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

0.61%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

0.79%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

0.77%

+3.20%

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMAX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

SCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than DFSMX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.36%2.08%2.80%1.94%0.63%0.19%0.83%1.22%1.11%0.95%0.94%0.95%
SCMAX
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free Fund
2.91%3.10%2.69%2.02%1.72%1.59%2.66%3.45%3.34%3.36%3.60%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCMAX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMAX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to DFSMX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMAX dropped -16.28% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMAX and DFSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer