PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCLZ vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCLZ achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.


SCLZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.49%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.52%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.46%11.12%3.46%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
2.91%14.14%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SCLZ and SPIN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.84

The correlation between SCLZ and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCLZ vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLZ
SCLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCLZSPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.02

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

8.42

+3.19

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCLZ and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCLZSPINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.95

+0.22

Drawdowns

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLZSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-16.85%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-9.81%

+2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.40%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-2.29%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.35%

-0.91%

Volatility

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is 1.62%, while State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that SCLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLZSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.82%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

8.03%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

10.49%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

14.33%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

14.33%

-2.98%

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCLZ vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
9.15%7.53%4.86%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCLZ and SPIN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPIN has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to SCLZ (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCLZ dropped -12.58% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 19.71% vs 16.69% for SCLZ. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SCLZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SCLZ.

SCLZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: Swan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCLZ and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer