SCLZ vs. SPIN
SCLZ (Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCLZ returned 16.69% vs 19.71% for SPIN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCLZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCLZ achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.
SCLZ
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 16.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.46% | 11.12% | 3.46% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 2.91% | 14.14% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCLZ and SPIN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SCLZ and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCLZ vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
SCLZ
SPIN
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCLZ | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.02 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 8.42 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCLZ | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.89 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.95 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCLZ | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -16.85% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -9.81% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.40% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.29% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 2.35% | -0.91% |
Volatility
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is 1.62%, while State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that SCLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCLZ | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.82% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 8.03% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 10.49% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 14.33% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 14.33% | -2.98% |
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCLZ vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 9.15% | 7.53% | 4.86% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCLZ and SPIN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPIN has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to SCLZ (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCLZ dropped -12.58% vs SPIN's -16.85%.
On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 19.71% vs 16.69% for SCLZ. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SCLZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SCLZ.
SCLZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Swan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 0.25% for SPIN.
SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCLZ and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer