PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCLZ vs. HEGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCLZ achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than HEGD's 6.84% return.


SCLZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.49%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEGD

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.52%
YTD
6.84%
6M
6.23%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.46%11.12%11.89%
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
6.84%12.95%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SCLZ and HEGD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

0.80

The correlation between SCLZ and HEGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCLZ vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLZ
SCLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HEGD
HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCLZHEGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

4.10

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

16.25

-4.65

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the HEGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCLZ and HEGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCLZHEGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.59

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.06

+0.11

Drawdowns

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum HEGD drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and HEGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLZHEGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-14.56%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-4.39%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.63%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-3.66%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.10%

+0.34%

Volatility

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is 1.62%, while Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that SCLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLZHEGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.34%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

4.95%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

6.96%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

9.40%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

9.35%

+2.00%

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCLZ vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison

SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than HEGD's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
0.34%0.36%0.43%0.39%0.87%0.31%
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
9.15%7.53%4.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCLZ and HEGD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEGD has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to SCLZ (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCLZ dropped -12.58% vs HEGD's -14.56%.

On 1-year performance, HEGD leads with 17.89% vs 16.69% for SCLZ. On fees, SCLZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SCLZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCLZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.

SCLZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 0.34% for HEGD.

SCLZ is categorized as Derivative Income, while HEGD is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 0.88% for HEGD.

HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCLZ and HEGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer