SCLZ vs. FIYY
SCLZ (Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCLZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCLZ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.50% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCLZ and FIYY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCLZ vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
SCLZ
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCLZ | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCLZ drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLZ and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCLZ | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -2.51% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -2.13% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -1.47% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCLZ | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.64% | 5.08% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 5.08% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 5.08% | +6.26% |
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCLZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCLZ vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
SCLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 7.98% | 7.53% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCLZ and FIYY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCLZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCLZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
SCLZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: Swan and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SCLZ and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for SCLZ and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer