PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCIEX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCIEX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than GCIIX's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCIEX has underperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.


SCIEX

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.68%
YTD
7.59%
6M
8.72%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
10.34%

GCIIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.94%
YTD
11.72%
6M
14.36%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCIEX
Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I
7.59%25.98%5.89%17.02%-18.76%11.38%24.91%25.18%-12.38%29.69%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
11.72%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SCIEX and GCIIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1997

0.92

The correlation between SCIEX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCIEX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCIEX
SCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCIEXGCIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.41

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

9.02

-3.91

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCIEX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCIEXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.95

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.74

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.31

+0.06

Drawdowns

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCIEX drawdown since its inception was -60.26%, roughly equal to the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCIEX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCIEXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.26%

-61.08%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-12.33%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-13.25%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.07%

-30.58%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

-39.85%

+6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.78%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-15.04%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.29%

+0.12%

Volatility

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCIEXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.75%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

12.73%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

15.29%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.11%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.79%

+0.32%

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCIEX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCIEX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

SCIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than GCIIX's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.97%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
SCIEX
Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I
2.55%2.74%0.00%1.27%1.37%1.95%0.32%1.22%8.64%1.18%1.77%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SCIEX and GCIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCIEX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to GCIIX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCIEX dropped -60.26% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCIEX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer