SCHQ vs. SPTB
SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index while SPTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCHQ returned 5.22% vs 3.87% for SPTB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's -0.07% return.
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 5.50% | -1.18% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | -0.07% | 6.14% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and SPTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SCHQ and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHQ vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHQ
SPTB
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHQ | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.34 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 3.98 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHQ | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.92 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and SPTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHQ | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.13% | -4.96% | -41.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -2.90% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.82% | -1.94% | -34.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -1.32% | -25.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 0.98% | +1.72% |
Volatility
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) at 1.11%. This indicates that SCHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHQ | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 1.11% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 2.47% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.93% | 3.64% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 4.42% | +10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 4.42% | +10.91% |
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHQ and SPTB have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.79% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 4.20% | 4.23% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCHQ and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SPTB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHQ dropped -46.13% vs SPTB's -4.96%.
On 1-year performance, SCHQ leads with 5.22% vs 3.87% for SPTB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SPTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHQ has performed better with a 5.22% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ and SPTB have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.
SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.
SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHQ and SPTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer