SCHQ vs. PBTP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP).

SCHQ and PBTP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. PBTP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). It was launched on Sep 22, 2017. Both SCHQ and PBTP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-0.06%	5.50%	-6.44%	3.43%	-29.44%	-4.86%	17.73%	-4.02%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	1.05%	5.98%	4.72%	4.53%	-3.02%	5.51%	4.89%	0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 1.05% return.

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: -0.50%
• 1Y: 0.41%
• 3Y*: -1.56%
• 5Y*: -4.81%
• 10Y*: —

PBTP

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

PBTP

Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF

SCHQ

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Return for Risk

SCHQ vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 13
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PBTP

PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 93
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHQ	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	2.01	-1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	3.02	-2.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.43	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	3.91	-3.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.31	12.96	-12.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHQ and PBTP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHQ	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04	2.01	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	1.21	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.27	-1.52

Correlation

The correlation between SCHQ and PBTP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than PBTP's 3.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.63%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	3.14%	3.82%	2.59%	2.36%	5.33%	3.12%	1.25%	2.12%	2.33%	0.73%

Drawdowns

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and PBTP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHQ	PBTP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.13%	-5.44%	-40.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.46%	-1.03%	-7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.93%	-5.44%	-35.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.58%	-0.24%	-36.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-0.77%	-25.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.87%	0.31%	+3.56%

Volatility

SCHQ vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.56%. This indicates that SCHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHQ	PBTP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	0.56%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.99%	1.05%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.39%	1.97%	+8.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	2.86%	+11.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.49%	2.66%	+12.83%