SCHQ vs. EGOV.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L).

SCHQ and EGOV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. EGOV.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. It was launched on Oct 1, 2019. Both SCHQ and EGOV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-0.10%	5.50%	-6.44%	3.43%	-29.44%	-4.86%	17.73%	-2.13%
EGOV.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	-1.76%	7.77%	-4.17%	3.96%	-17.03%	-6.60%	8.78%	0.96%

Different Trading Currencies

SCHQ is traded in USD, while EGOV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EGOV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than EGOV.L's -1.76% return.

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.76%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: -1.57%
• 5Y*: -4.82%
• 10Y*: —

EGOV.L

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 6M: -2.18%
• 1Y: 2.79%
• 3Y*: 1.11%
• 5Y*: -2.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EGOV.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

EGOV.L

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc

SCHQ

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Return for Risk

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EGOV.L

EGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
EGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
EGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHQ	EGOV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	0.45	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	0.70	-0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.08	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	0.59	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	1.69	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the EGOV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHQ and EGOV.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHQ	EGOV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03	0.45	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	-0.31	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.17	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between SCHQ and EGOV.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Dividend Comparison

SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while EGOV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.73%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%
EGOV.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than EGOV.L's maximum drawdown of -31.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and EGOV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHQ	EGOV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.13%	-25.11%	-21.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.46%	-4.28%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.93%	-16.45%	-24.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.61%	-22.09%	-14.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-16.42%	-9.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	2.53%	+1.35%

Volatility

SCHQ vs. EGOV.L - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that SCHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGOV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHQ	EGOV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	2.65%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.99%	4.49%	+1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.36%	7.03%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	9.24%	+5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	9.61%	+5.87%