SCHO vs. FYLD
SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. SCHO is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHO returned 1.71%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for FYLD. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
SCHO vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 1.71%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 37.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
SCHO vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.58% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 1.37% | 0.33% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.06% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and FYLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | -0.07 |
The correlation between SCHO and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHO vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHO
FYLD
SCHO vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHO | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.56 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 6.91 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.10 | 24.32 | -7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHO | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -44.55% | +38.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | -5.44% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -15.15% | +14.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.69% | -25.12% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.69% | -44.55% | +38.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -1.08% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -8.81% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 1.54% | -1.34% |
Volatility
SCHO vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.43%, while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHO | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 3.78% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 9.24% | -8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 11.87% | -10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 16.28% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 18.01% | -16.45% |
SCHO vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHO vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than FYLD's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.63% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHO and FYLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYLD has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.83% vs 1.71% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.63% for FYLD.
SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHO and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer