SCHO vs. AVUV
SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. SCHO is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHO returned 1.82%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for AVUV. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
SCHO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 40.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.54% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 0.62% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.73% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and AVUV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | -0.04 |
The correlation between SCHO and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHO vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHO
AVUV
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SCHO
AVUV
Technology
SCHO
AVUV
Financial Services
SCHO
AVUV
Basic Materials
SCHO
-
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHO
-
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
SCHO
-
AVUV
Energy
SCHO
-
AVUV
Healthcare
SCHO
-
AVUV
Industrials
SCHO
-
AVUV
Real Estate
SCHO
-
AVUV
Utilities
SCHO
-
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHO
AVUV
SCHO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 5.06 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.48 | 15.09 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -49.42% | +43.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | -7.95% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -28.79% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.69% | -28.79% | +23.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -7.91% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 2.67% | -2.47% |
Volatility
SCHO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.43%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 4.53% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 11.34% | -10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 17.63% | -16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 22.75% | -20.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 28.26% | -26.70% |
SCHO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHO and AVUV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 1.82% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.
SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.25% for AVUV.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHO and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer