PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHN.SW vs. BN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SCHN.SW is traded in CHF, while BN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BN values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHN.SW achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than BN's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHN.SW has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 4.95%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.


SCHN.SW

1D
1.19%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-4.49%
1Y
-8.65%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
4.95%

BN

1D
2.28%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-4.97%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
24.63%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
-7.03%16.25%24.60%22.17%-30.41%4.07%2.57%26.97%-11.80%25.25%
BN
Brookfield Corporation
-2.16%5.32%55.54%17.09%-33.91%53.70%-0.20%50.08%-9.79%28.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHN.SW and BN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.28

The correlation between SCHN.SW and BN shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHN.SW vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHN.SW
SCHN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BN
BN Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHN.SWBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.10

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.58

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

1.58

-2.66

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHN.SW and BN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHN.SWBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

0.46

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.29

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.41

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.28

+0.14

Drawdowns

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHN.SW drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -70.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHN.SW and BN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHN.SWBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-70.70%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.67%

-22.86%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

-32.82%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.15%

-41.36%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.15%

-51.41%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.76%

-8.96%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

-19.17%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

8.40%

-0.34%

Volatility

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW) is 4.98%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 9.18%. This indicates that SCHN.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHN.SWBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

9.18%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

21.81%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

28.69%

-9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

31.12%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

30.56%

-9.34%

Dividends

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

SCHN.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than BN's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BN
Brookfield Corporation
0.55%0.52%0.56%0.70%1.44%1.12%1.55%1.11%1.56%1.29%1.58%1.50%
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
2.35%2.13%0.40%2.01%2.40%1.64%1.68%1.69%2.10%0.91%1.52%1.30%

Financials

SCHN.SW vs. BN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schindler Holding AG and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SCHN.SW values in CHF, BN values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHN.SW and BN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHN.SW and BN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer