PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHI vs. CLOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHI vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHI achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than CLOI's 2.31% return.


SCHI

1D
0.27%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*

CLOI

1D
0.08%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.60%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHI vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%9.47%3.32%8.97%-0.67%
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
2.31%5.84%8.26%8.95%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHI and CLOI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHI vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOI
CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHI vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHICLOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.24

-0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

9.04

-7.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

42.86

-36.65

SCHI vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 4.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHI and CLOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHI vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHI drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHI and CLOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHICLOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-3.25%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-0.62%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-3.25%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

0.00%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-0.19%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.13%

+0.80%

Volatility

SCHI vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.22%. This indicates that SCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHICLOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

0.22%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

0.68%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

1.16%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

2.54%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.38%

2.54%

+4.84%

SCHI vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHI vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

SCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than CLOI's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
5.33%5.61%6.71%5.61%2.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.04%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHI and CLOI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHI has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to CLOI (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHI dropped -20.67% vs CLOI's -3.25%.

On 3-year performance, CLOI leads with 7.03% vs 6.19% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CLOI has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CLOI has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CLOI.

CLOI has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 5.04% for SCHI.

SCHI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CLOI is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHI and 0.40% for CLOI.

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.90 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHI and CLOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer