PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCGSX vs. POGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCGSX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than POGRX's 26.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGSX has underperformed POGRX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while POGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


SCGSX

1D
0.32%
1M
7.09%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.78%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
16.12%

POGRX

1D
-0.02%
1M
15.42%
YTD
26.45%
6M
27.81%
1Y
64.17%
3Y*
29.06%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCGSX
DWS Capital Growth Fund
7.91%12.34%26.27%38.61%-30.88%22.41%38.60%36.98%-1.96%26.27%
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
26.45%32.99%13.09%23.85%-14.61%18.81%17.05%23.98%-4.56%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SCGSX and POGRX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.88

The correlation between SCGSX and POGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCGSX vs. POGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCGSX
SCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

POGRX
POGRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
POGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
POGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCGSXPOGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.65

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

4.60

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

19.58

-16.06

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the POGRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCGSX and POGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCGSXPOGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

3.69

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.82

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.66

-0.23

Drawdowns

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCGSX drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, roughly equal to the maximum POGRX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGSX and POGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCGSXPOGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.63%

-51.63%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.09%

-14.40%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-22.13%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-26.85%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-35.29%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-7.13%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

3.37%

+2.19%

Volatility

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) is 3.54%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that SCGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCGSXPOGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

7.05%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

14.59%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

17.96%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

19.60%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

20.47%

+0.01%

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCGSX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than POGRX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCGSX vs. POGRX - Dividend Comparison

SCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, less than POGRX's 19.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
19.68%24.89%20.79%13.28%12.36%13.68%12.50%5.13%2.45%1.54%5.83%1.29%
SCGSX
DWS Capital Growth Fund
7.07%7.62%9.06%7.18%7.81%6.64%5.59%5.98%17.00%9.08%8.49%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCGSX and POGRX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POGRX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to SCGSX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGSX dropped -50.63% vs POGRX's -51.63%.

POGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCGSX and POGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer