PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCGSX vs. KDHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCGSX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than KDHAX's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGSX has outperformed KDHAX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while KDHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.22% annualized return.


SCGSX

1D
0.32%
1M
7.09%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.78%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
16.12%

KDHAX

1D
0.34%
1M
7.96%
YTD
11.60%
6M
11.67%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCGSX
DWS Capital Growth Fund
7.91%12.34%26.27%38.61%-30.88%22.41%38.60%36.98%-1.96%26.27%
KDHAX
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd
11.60%2.92%13.37%5.30%1.09%19.44%-9.41%29.38%-3.45%19.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SCGSX and KDHAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SCGSX and KDHAX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCGSX vs. KDHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCGSX
SCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

KDHAX
KDHAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KDHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KDHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCGSXKDHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.88

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

5.12

-1.60

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the KDHAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCGSX and KDHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCGSXKDHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.55

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCGSX drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, smaller than the maximum KDHAX drawdown of -65.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGSX and KDHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCGSXKDHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.63%

-65.77%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.09%

-10.93%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-16.91%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-16.91%

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-40.08%

+4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-9.40%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

3.99%

+1.57%

Volatility

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCGSXKDHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.67%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

9.35%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

13.55%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

14.01%

+6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

16.86%

+3.62%

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCGSX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than KDHAX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCGSX vs. KDHAX - Dividend Comparison

SCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, less than KDHAX's 14.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KDHAX
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd
14.92%15.94%9.07%5.94%6.24%9.57%5.53%7.13%12.23%1.60%1.81%2.34%
SCGSX
DWS Capital Growth Fund
7.07%7.62%9.06%7.18%7.81%6.64%5.59%5.98%17.00%9.08%8.49%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCGSX and KDHAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDHAX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to SCGSX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGSX dropped -50.63% vs KDHAX's -65.77%.

KDHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCGSX and KDHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer