PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCFZX vs. PADZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCFZX having a 2.28% return and PADZX slightly higher at 2.29%.


SCFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
2.28%
6M
2.84%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*

PADZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.78%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
4.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
2.28%5.75%9.41%8.67%-0.84%5.27%-0.33%1.73%
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
2.29%5.10%7.48%6.11%-1.55%1.87%0.59%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCFZX and PADZX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCFZX vs. PADZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCFZX
SCFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SCFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PADZX
PADZX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PADZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PADZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCFZXPADZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.09

2.78

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

17.53

6.26

+11.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.28

2.86

+3.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

20.02

7.71

+12.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

69.95

40.05

+29.91

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCFZX Sharpe Ratio is 4.09, which is higher than the PADZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCFZX and PADZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCFZXPADZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09

2.78

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.78

1.85

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.20

+0.16

Drawdowns

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCFZX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, roughly equal to the maximum PADZX drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCFZX and PADZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCFZXPADZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-17.99%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.31%

-0.76%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

-0.98%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.13%

-4.05%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-0.95%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

0.15%

-0.06%

Volatility

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) is 0.42%, while PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that SCFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PADZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCFZXPADZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

1.42%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

1.77%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

2.10%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.91%

2.16%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.16%

+0.19%

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCFZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PADZX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCFZX vs. PADZX - Dividend Comparison

SCFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, which matches PADZX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
5.08%5.07%5.18%4.09%2.89%2.40%3.41%10.79%5.02%2.75%2.36%2.38%
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
5.08%5.25%6.55%5.58%4.97%2.56%3.08%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCFZX and PADZX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PADZX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SCFZX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCFZX dropped -17.20% vs PADZX's -17.99%.

SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCFZX and PADZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer