SCFIX vs. CYBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) and Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX).
SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012. CYBIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jul 9, 2001.
Performance
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.61% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
CYBIX Calvert High Yield Bond Fund | -2.08% | 7.73% | 6.70% | 10.02% | -11.50% | 3.66% | 5.46% | 12.82% | -2.53% | 6.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCFIX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly higher than CYBIX's -2.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCFIX having a 4.30% annualized return and CYBIX not far ahead at 4.31%.
SCFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
CYBIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCFIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCFIX vs. CYBIX — Risk / Return Rank
SCFIX
CYBIX
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) and Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCFIX | CYBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 1.56 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.70 | 2.28 | +1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.34 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.82 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | 8.08 | +7.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCFIX | CYBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.56 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.60 | 0.56 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.05 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCFIX and CYBIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Dividend Comparison
SCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than CYBIX's 5.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
CYBIX Calvert High Yield Bond Fund | 5.13% | 5.44% | 5.25% | 4.47% | 4.12% | 4.22% | 4.49% | 4.98% | 5.20% | 4.92% | 5.51% | 5.78% |
Drawdowns
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCFIX drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum CYBIX drawdown of -32.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCFIX and CYBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCFIX | CYBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -32.13% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -2.63% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.30% | -14.95% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.08% | -17.55% | +4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -2.39% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.37% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.59% | -0.28% |
Volatility
SCFIX vs. CYBIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) is 0.79%, while Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that SCFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCFIX | CYBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 1.28% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 2.08% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 3.28% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 4.51% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.27% | 4.59% | -1.32% |