PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCEMX vs. DBLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (SCEMX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCEMX achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than DBLLX's 1.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCEMX having a 3.62% annualized return and DBLLX not far behind at 3.53%.


SCEMX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.04%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.07%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
3.62%

DBLLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
3.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCEMX
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
2.80%11.92%10.90%11.11%-19.36%-1.37%4.62%14.69%-6.32%9.12%
DBLLX
DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
1.10%7.86%7.20%7.00%-5.05%-0.21%3.53%8.57%-0.04%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SCEMX and DBLLX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2014

0.51

The correlation between SCEMX and DBLLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCEMX vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCEMX
SCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLLX
DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (SCEMX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCEMXDBLLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

2.63

-0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

5.98

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

27.44

-12.17

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is lower than the DBLLX Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCEMX and DBLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCEMXDBLLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

4.80

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.79

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.86

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.70

-1.08

Drawdowns

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCEMX drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, which is greater than DBLLX's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCEMX and DBLLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCEMXDBLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-10.13%

-37.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-0.92%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

-1.35%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

-10.13%

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

-10.13%

-23.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-1.29%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.20%

+0.69%

Volatility

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (SCEMX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) at 0.42%. This indicates that SCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCEMXDBLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.42%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.47%

0.90%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

1.15%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

1.94%

+4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

1.90%

+4.62%

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCEMX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLLX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCEMX vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison

SCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than DBLLX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLLX
DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
5.08%5.27%4.70%3.74%2.41%2.15%2.61%4.93%2.87%3.00%3.19%3.77%
SCEMX
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
7.48%5.59%6.60%6.29%6.54%4.83%4.42%4.10%4.26%3.81%4.93%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCEMX and DBLLX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCEMX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to DBLLX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCEMX dropped -47.49% vs DBLLX's -10.13%.

DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCEMX and DBLLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer