SCDV vs. EPSB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) and EPSB (Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCDV returned 19.54% vs 29.17% for EPSB. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCDV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPSB.

Performance

SCDV vs. EPSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDV achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly lower than EPSB's 21.19% return.

SCDV

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: 9.21%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.82%

EPSB

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 11.89%
• YTD: 21.19%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	$2.00K	$4.19K	$12.22K
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	$311.79K	$227.29K	$226.68K

SCDV vs. EPSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	17.67%	12.72%
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	21.19%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDV and EPSB is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.87

The correlation between SCDV and EPSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCDV vs. EPSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCDV

SCDV Risk / Return Rank: 44
SCDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SCDV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SCDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCDV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

EPSB

EPSB Risk / Return Rank: 79
EPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCDV vs. EPSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCDV	EPSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.93	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.88	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.46	-1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	11.93	-6.76

SCDV vs. EPSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the EPSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDV and EPSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCDV vs. EPSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDV drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, which is greater than EPSB's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDV and EPSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDV	EPSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.14%	-8.46%	-14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-8.46%	-2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.61%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.29%	-1.50%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	2.45%	+1.34%

Volatility

SCDV vs. EPSB - Volatility Comparison

Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) at 3.57%. This indicates that SCDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDV	EPSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	3.57%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	11.12%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	15.23%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.83%	15.25%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	15.25%	+3.58%

SCDV vs. EPSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSB's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDV vs. EPSB - Dividend Comparison

SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than EPSB's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	1.12%	1.36%	0.00%
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	0.41%	0.61%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDV and EPSB in my portfolio?

SCDV and EPSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDV or EPSB?

SCDV has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to EPSB (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDV dropped -23.14% vs EPSB's -8.46%.

Which ETF is better, SCDV or EPSB?

On 1-year performance, EPSB leads with 29.17% vs 19.54% for SCDV. On fees, SCDV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, EPSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDV or EPSB?

Over the 1-year period, EPSB has performed better with a 29.17% return vs 19.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDV or EPSB?

SCDV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDV or EPSB?

EPSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.41% for SCDV.

What is the main difference between SCDV and EPSB?

They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SCDV and 0.88% for EPSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.