SCDS vs. DBO
SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. SCDS is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, SCDS returned 46.17% vs 78.18% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
SCDS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
SCDS
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
SCDS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 23.60% | 11.27% | 7.26% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDS and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024 | -0.06 |
The correlation between SCDS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCDS vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCDS
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SCDS
DBO
-
Financial Services
SCDS
DBO
Industrials
SCDS
DBO
-
Healthcare
SCDS
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCDS
DBO
-
Real Estate
SCDS
DBO
-
Energy
SCDS
DBO
-
Basic Materials
SCDS
DBO
-
Utilities
SCDS
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
SCDS
DBO
-
Communication Services
SCDS
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
SCDS
DBO
SCDS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 2.28 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 2.88 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.62 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.30 | 9.43 | +8.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.28 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.02 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
SCDS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -90.18% | +63.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -18.19% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.46% | +52.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -62.25% | +56.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 8.92% | -6.38% |
Volatility
SCDS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is 5.53%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that SCDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 13.25% | -7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 28.15% | -15.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 34.54% | -16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 32.28% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 31.78% | -10.56% |
SCDS vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than DBO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.91% | 1.15% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDS and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to SCDS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 78.18% vs 46.17% for SCDS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 78.18% return vs 46.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.91% for SCDS.
SCDS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.78% for DBO.
SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDS and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer