SCDGX vs. NWAUX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX).

SCDGX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 31, 1929. NWAUX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 24, 2021.

Performance

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SCDGX DWS Core Equity Fund	-7.39%	16.32%	20.01%	25.55%	-15.61%	22.23%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	9.70%	-4.92%	27.90%	18.30%	-3.23%	22.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDGX achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.

SCDGX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -7.41%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: -4.90%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 13.19%

NWAUX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 7.83%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.

NWAUX

Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund

SCDGX

DWS Core Equity Fund

Return for Risk

SCDGX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDGX

SCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

NWAUX

NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 17
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCDGX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.49	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.73	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.10	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	0.58	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.16	1.36	+2.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDGX and NWAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCDGX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.49	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.79	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.83	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between SCDGX and NWAUX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

SCDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCDGX DWS Core Equity Fund	11.48%	10.50%	9.11%	5.12%	9.28%	14.09%	6.70%	8.88%	14.12%	6.15%	6.92%	8.72%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	4.69%	4.35%	13.58%	0.40%	1.93%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDGX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDGX and NWAUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDGX	NWAUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.85%	-21.07%	-34.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-8.87%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.77%	-21.07%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.43%	-7.03%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-6.85%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	3.83%	-0.99%

Volatility

SCDGX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that SCDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDGX	NWAUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	2.74%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	7.29%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	12.58%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	16.10%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	16.05%	+2.31%