SCC vs. IQQQ
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while IQQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCC returned -15.16% vs 21.93% for IQQQ. Their -0.74 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IQQQ.
Performance
SCC vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 10.08% return.
SCC
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- -15.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.88%
- 5Y*
- -14.68%
- 10Y*
- -24.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.78%
IQQQ
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.00M | $2.37M | $2.93M | |
| $353.66K | $227.58K | $240.11K |
SCC vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.71% | -18.97% | -34.79% |
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.08% | 17.11% | 14.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and IQQQ is -0.67, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | -0.74 |
The correlation between SCC and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
IQQQ
SCC vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.19 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.76 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 5.26 | -5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and IQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -20.41% | -79.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -11.25% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -7.56% | -92.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.05% | -3.71% | -82.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 3.77% | +13.03% |
Volatility
SCC vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 13.88% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) at 6.84%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.88% | 6.84% | +7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 15.11% | +14.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 18.47% | +20.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.54% | 19.30% | +25.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 19.30% | +20.37% |
SCC vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than IQQQ's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 5.37% | 10.34% | 7.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.46% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and IQQQ have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (13.88%) compared to IQQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.
On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 21.93% vs -15.16% for SCC. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 21.93% return vs -15.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.37%, compared with 3.46% for SCC.
SCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. SCC tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.55% for IQQQ.
IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and IQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer