SCC vs. DFSU
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and DFSU (Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while DFSU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. SCC is passively managed, while DFSU is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCC returned -25.44%/yr vs 20.21%/yr for DFSU. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFSU.
Performance
SCC vs. DFSU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than DFSU's 7.31% return.
SCC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- -15.43%
- 3Y*
- -25.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.79%
- 10Y*
- -25.08%
DFSU
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCC vs. DFSU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.99% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | -0.58% |
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 7.31% | 15.65% | 22.96% | 26.27% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and DFSU is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | -0.83 |
The correlation between SCC and DFSU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. DFSU — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
DFSU
SCC vs. DFSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCC | DFSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.34 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 10.16 | -10.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCC | DFSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.82 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 1.26 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
SCC vs. DFSU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than DFSU's maximum drawdown of -19.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and DFSU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | DFSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -19.88% | -80.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | -10.12% | -18.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -19.88% | -47.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -0.69% | -99.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.95% | -2.66% | -83.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.21% | 2.32% | +16.89% |
Volatility
SCC vs. DFSU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) at 3.02%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | DFSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 3.02% | +7.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 9.67% | +16.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.34% | 13.03% | +23.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 16.25% | +27.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 16.25% | +23.27% |
SCC vs. DFSU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. DFSU - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than DFSU's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.53% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and DFSU have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to DFSU (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs DFSU's -19.88%.
On 3-year performance, DFSU leads with 20.21% vs -25.44% for SCC. On fees, DFSU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFSU has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSU has performed better with a 20.21% return vs -25.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 0.83% for DFSU.
SCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DFSU is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.18% for DFSU.
DFSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and DFSU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer