SCATX vs. TILIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX).
SCATX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 23, 2004. TILIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
SCATX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCATX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund | -18.58% | 10.22% | 35.81% | 65.58% | -55.30% | -9.93% | 119.67% | 37.02% | 10.84% | 34.23% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.04% | 18.41% | 33.31% | 42.64% | -29.22% | 27.63% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.66% | 28.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCATX achieves a -18.58% return, which is significantly lower than TILIX's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SCATX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 14.45%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.
SCATX
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- -18.58%
- 6M
- -20.81%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- -2.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
TILIX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCATX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCATX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCATX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank
SCATX
TILIX
SCATX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCATX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 0.65 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | 1.10 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 0.67 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 2.32 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCATX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.65 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.56 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.77 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCATX and TILIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCATX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison
SCATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.18% | 10.09% | 18.59% | 7.30% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 5.07% | 4.41% | 3.25% | 1.90% | 11.00% | 8.76% | 1.91% | 2.38% | 4.01% | 0.68% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
Drawdowns
SCATX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCATX drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than TILIX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCATX and TILIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCATX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -50.54% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.17% | -16.24% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -32.68% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.92% | -32.68% | -34.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.83% | -16.24% | -14.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -7.77% | -8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 4.73% | +3.78% |
Volatility
SCATX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 5.34%. This indicates that SCATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCATX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 5.34% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 11.80% | +6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.45% | 22.35% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.24% | 21.44% | +14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.55% | 21.01% | +11.54% |