SCATX vs. EDF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SCATX (Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SCATX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while EDF is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, SCATX returned 15.65%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for EDF. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SCATX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.

Performance

SCATX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCATX achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SCATX has outperformed EDF with an annualized return of 15.65%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.74% annualized return.

SCATX

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: -7.06%
• 6M: -1.35%
• YTD: -3.54%
• 1Y: -2.19%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: -0.34%
• 10Y*: 15.65%
• ALL TIME*: 11.65%

EDF

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -4.94%
• 6M: 11.33%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 1Y: 17.74%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: 3.74%
• ALL TIME*: 3.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	$420.04K	$687.29K	$820.26K
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SCATX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund	-3.54%	10.22%	35.81%	65.58%	-55.30%	-9.93%	119.67%	37.02%	10.84%	34.23%
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	13.38%	22.24%	25.54%	21.63%	-27.96%	-8.47%	-31.14%	45.06%	-18.24%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SCATX and EDF is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2010	0.28

Return for Risk

SCATX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCATX

SCATX Risk / Return Rank: 3
SCATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SCATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SCATX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SCATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SCATX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EDF

EDF Risk / Return Rank: 43
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCATX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCATX	EDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.16	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	1.76	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.21	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	1.91	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	5.92	-6.40

SCATX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCATX Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCATX and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCATX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCATX drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, roughly equal to the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCATX and EDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCATX	EDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.92%	-64.23%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.17%	-9.44%	-16.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-23.40%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	-52.47%	-11.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.92%	-64.23%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.06%	-7.12%	-10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-21.30%	+5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.63%	3.04%	+7.59%

Volatility

SCATX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) at 6.00%. This indicates that SCATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCATX	EDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	6.00%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.96%	13.27%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.65%	15.63%	+10.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.21%	25.76%	+10.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.78%	30.72%	+2.06%

SCATX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCATX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCATX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

SCATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than EDF's 13.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	13.85%	14.49%	15.32%	16.71%	17.31%	12.91%	16.46%	15.67%	19.37%	13.58%	14.75%	17.93%
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.18%	10.09%	18.59%	7.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCATX and EDF in my portfolio?

SCATX and EDF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCATX or EDF?

SCATX has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to EDF (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCATX dropped -66.92% vs EDF's -64.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.