PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Materials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0W.DE achieves a 32.91% return, which is significantly higher than WELV.DE's 16.85% return.


SC0W.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
11.15%
YTD
32.91%
6M
42.46%
1Y
84.15%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
17.03%

WELV.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
16.85%
6M
21.50%
1Y
32.47%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SC0W.DE
Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF
32.91%33.79%-7.95%-3.82%2.98%
WELV.DE
Amundi S&P Global Materials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
16.85%14.77%-0.57%9.65%-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0W.DE and WELV.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2022

0.68

The correlation between SC0W.DE and WELV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0W.DE
SC0W.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SC0W.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WELV.DE
WELV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WELV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WELV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Materials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0W.DEWELV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.33

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

2.34

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.77

9.43

+9.34

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0W.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the WELV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0W.DE and WELV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0W.DEWELV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

1.86

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.76

-0.48

Drawdowns

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0W.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.06%, which is greater than WELV.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0W.DE and WELV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0W.DEWELV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.06%

-21.27%

-46.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.64%

-14.36%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.35%

-21.27%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-1.63%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-4.71%

-17.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.51%

+0.87%

Volatility

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Amundi S&P Global Materials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELV.DE) at 6.61%. This indicates that SC0W.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0W.DEWELV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

6.61%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.56%

15.33%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.72%

18.02%

+8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.37%

16.99%

+10.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

16.99%

+11.36%

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0W.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WELV.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0W.DE vs. WELV.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC0W.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELV.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
SC0W.DE
Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELV.DE
Amundi S&P Global Materials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
1.43%1.77%2.71%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0W.DE and WELV.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELV.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELV.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0W.DE.

SC0W.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Basic Resources, while WELV.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Materials. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0W.DE and 0.18% for WELV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0W.DE and WELV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer