PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0W.DE achieves a 32.91% return, which is significantly higher than ESIN.DE's 8.75% return.


SC0W.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
11.15%
YTD
32.91%
6M
42.46%
1Y
84.15%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
17.03%

ESIN.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.75%
6M
11.05%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SC0W.DE
Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF
32.91%33.79%-7.95%-3.82%9.72%1.71%
ESIN.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
8.75%25.30%14.45%26.98%-16.86%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021

0.55

The correlation between SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0W.DE
SC0W.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SC0W.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0W.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIN.DE
ESIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0W.DEESIN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.15

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

1.16

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.77

4.21

+14.56

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0W.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0W.DEESIN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

0.78

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.67

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.70

-0.42

Drawdowns

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0W.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.06%, which is greater than ESIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0W.DEESIN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.06%

-29.12%

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.64%

-13.11%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.35%

-18.30%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.09%

-29.12%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-2.69%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-6.30%

-15.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.61%

+0.77%

Volatility

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) at 6.37%. This indicates that SC0W.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0W.DEESIN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

6.37%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.56%

16.51%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.72%

19.60%

+7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.37%

18.85%

+8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

18.81%

+9.54%

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0W.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIN.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0W.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0W.DE nor ESIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0W.DE.

SC0W.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Basic Resources, while ESIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0W.DE and 0.18% for ESIN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0W.DE and ESIN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer