PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SC0V.DE having a 34.01% return and XDW0.DE slightly lower at 32.75%. Over the past 10 years, SC0V.DE has outperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 11.36%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


SC0V.DE

1D
-0.63%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
34.01%
6M
32.79%
1Y
58.80%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
11.36%

XDW0.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.29%
YTD
32.75%
6M
28.86%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0V.DE
Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF
34.01%29.15%-5.65%5.37%30.86%20.64%-20.83%10.41%-0.18%2.31%
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.75%2.24%7.48%0.18%53.95%52.18%-36.97%14.05%-12.13%-7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.84

The correlation between SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0V.DE
SC0V.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SC0V.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0V.DEXDW0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.37

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.93

2.98

+4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.20

9.92

+18.28

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0V.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0V.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.10

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.84

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.37

-0.02

Drawdowns

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0V.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.15%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0V.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.15%

-61.44%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-15.05%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-23.71%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.22%

-23.71%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.15%

-61.44%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-7.38%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-13.84%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

4.53%

-2.46%

Volatility

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) is 6.07%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that SC0V.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0V.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

6.96%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

18.42%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

21.48%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.74%

24.04%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

26.02%

-2.09%

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0V.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0V.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0V.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0V.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0V.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

SC0V.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Oil & Gas, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0V.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0V.DE and XDW0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer