SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE
SC0V.DE (Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - SC0V.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Oil & Gas while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SC0V.DE returned 11.36%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for QDVF.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SC0V.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SC0V.DE having a 34.01% return and QDVF.DE slightly lower at 32.71%. Over the past 10 years, SC0V.DE has outperformed QDVF.DE with an annualized return of 11.36%, while QDVF.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
SC0V.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 34.01%
- 6M
- 32.79%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0V.DE Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF | 34.01% | 29.15% | -5.65% | 5.37% | 30.86% | 20.64% | -20.83% | 10.41% | -0.18% | 2.31% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 13.02% | -14.92% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0V.DE and QDVF.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SC0V.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SC0V.DE
QDVF.DE
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SC0V.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.32 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 2.54 | +5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.20 | 7.98 | +20.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SC0V.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 1.82 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.79 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.31 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.28 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0V.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.15%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0V.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SC0V.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.15% | -65.81% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -17.23% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.22% | -27.13% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.22% | -27.13% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.15% | -65.81% | +8.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -8.92% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -17.41% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 5.49% | -3.42% |
Volatility
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) is 6.07%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SC0V.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SC0V.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 7.70% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 20.43% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 24.05% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 26.95% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 28.68% | -4.75% |
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0V.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SC0V.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0V.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SC0V.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0V.DE.
SC0V.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Oil & Gas, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0V.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for SC0V.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer