SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE
SC0P.DE (Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF) and XZEC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - SC0P.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Automobiles & Parts while XZEC.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened 20-35 Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SC0P.DE returned -6.25%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for XZEC.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SC0P.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for XZEC.DE.
Performance
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SC0P.DE achieves a -11.55% return, which is significantly lower than XZEC.DE's 3.52% return.
SC0P.DE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- -11.55%
- 6M
- -13.18%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- -6.25%
- 5Y*
- -4.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
XZEC.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 11.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0P.DE Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF | -11.55% | 2.03% | -10.79% | 24.20% | -16.71% | 0.64% |
XZEC.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 3.52% | 1.95% | 3.52% | 16.28% | -16.49% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0P.DE and XZEC.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SC0P.DE and XZEC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SC0P.DE
XZEC.DE
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF (SC0P.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SC0P.DE | XZEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.13 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.98 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 2.63 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SC0P.DE | XZEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 0.73 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.06 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0P.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, which is greater than XZEC.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0P.DE and XZEC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SC0P.DE | XZEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.05% | -30.22% | -29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.74% | -11.27% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.82% | -23.79% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.84% | -4.58% | -26.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -10.22% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | 4.19% | +4.80% |
Volatility
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF (SC0P.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that SC0P.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SC0P.DE | XZEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.04% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.30% | 11.07% | +6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 15.07% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 20.02% | +4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 20.02% | +6.07% |
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0P.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZEC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SC0P.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0P.DE nor XZEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SC0P.DE and XZEC.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZEC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZEC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0P.DE.
SC0P.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Automobiles & Parts, while XZEC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened 20-35 Select. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0P.DE and 0.17% for XZEC.DE.
Find the right allocation for SC0P.DE and XZEC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer