SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE
SC0K.DE (Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF) and SXRG.DE (iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SC0K.DE tracks the Russell 2000® while SXRG.DE tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced Focus CTB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SC0K.DE returned 10.39%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for SXRG.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SC0K.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for SXRG.DE.
Performance
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SC0K.DE achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly higher than SXRG.DE's 16.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SC0K.DE having a 10.39% annualized return and SXRG.DE not far ahead at 10.73%.
SC0K.DE
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
SXRG.DE
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 31.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0K.DE Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF | 17.93% | 1.56% | 15.91% | 14.84% | -16.55% | 24.70% | 8.14% | 29.08% | -9.05% | 0.67% |
SXRG.DE iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) | 16.26% | -1.21% | 15.85% | 13.82% | -12.53% | 29.74% | 6.96% | 30.76% | -7.93% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0K.DE and SXRG.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SC0K.DE and SXRG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SC0K.DE
SXRG.DE
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (SC0K.DE) and iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SC0K.DE | SXRG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 5.15 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.31 | 15.48 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SC0K.DE | SXRG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.01 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0K.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SXRG.DE drawdown of -41.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0K.DE and SXRG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SC0K.DE | SXRG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -41.79% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -6.17% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.50% | -31.54% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -31.54% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -41.79% | +0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -7.92% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.06% | +0.83% |
Volatility
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (SC0K.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRG.DE) at 3.75%. This indicates that SC0K.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SC0K.DE | SXRG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 3.75% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 10.11% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 15.79% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 19.72% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 20.35% | +1.25% |
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0K.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRG.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SC0K.DE vs. SXRG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0K.DE nor SXRG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SC0K.DE and SXRG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SXRG.DE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRG.DE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SC0K.DE.
SC0K.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while SXRG.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced Focus CTB. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SC0K.DE and 0.43% for SXRG.DE.
Find the right allocation for SC0K.DE and SXRG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer