PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0J.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than IQQ0.DE's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0J.DE has outperformed IQQ0.DE with an annualized return of 12.86%, while IQQ0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


SC0J.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.89%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.36%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.86%

IQQ0.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.50%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.72%
1Y
-0.28%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0J.DE
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc
10.95%7.78%26.07%20.32%-13.60%32.76%5.64%31.45%-5.00%7.71%
IQQ0.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.59%-1.26%17.64%3.73%-4.34%24.26%-6.77%26.17%2.03%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0J.DE
SC0J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SC0J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQ0.DE
IQQ0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IQQ0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0J.DEIQQ0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.00

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

-0.05

+3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

-0.12

+14.78

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the IQQ0.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0J.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

-0.04

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.60

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.58

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.76

+0.11

Drawdowns

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0J.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than IQQ0.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0J.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-28.65%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-5.22%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.66%

-12.82%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-12.82%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.91%

-28.65%

-5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-6.65%

+6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-4.54%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.44%

-0.81%

Volatility

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0J.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.53%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

5.36%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.15%

7.78%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

10.08%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

11.62%

+3.47%

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0J.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQ0.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC0J.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0J.DE nor IQQ0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0J.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0J.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQQ0.DE.

SC0J.DE tracks MSCI World, while IQQ0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0J.DE and 0.30% for IQQ0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0J.DE and IQQ0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer