PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (SC0E.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SC0E.DE is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0E.DE achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 24.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0E.DE has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 9.06%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.02% annualized return.


SC0E.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
3.45%
YTD
7.48%
6M
9.73%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
9.06%

XLKQ.L

1D
-2.32%
1M
14.20%
YTD
24.91%
6M
23.54%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
32.98%
5Y*
26.44%
10Y*
26.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0E.DE
Invesco MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
7.48%20.15%8.25%15.48%-9.29%24.97%-3.28%27.71%-11.02%10.40%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
24.91%9.72%50.98%55.05%-24.67%45.15%30.44%54.10%-0.69%18.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.51

The correlation between SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0E.DE
SC0E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SC0E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (SC0E.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0E.DEXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.18

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

8.52

-2.20

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0E.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.55

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.16

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

1.24

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.23

-0.51

Drawdowns

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0E.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-30.78%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-15.78%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-30.46%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-30.46%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-30.78%

-4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-3.01%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-5.56%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

5.91%

-3.36%

Volatility

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (SC0E.DE) is 4.35%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that SC0E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0E.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

6.61%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

14.55%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

19.72%

-6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

22.75%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

22.09%

-5.73%

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0E.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0E.DE nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SC0E.DE.

SC0E.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. SC0E.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0E.DE and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0E.DE and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer