PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC04.DE achieves a -10.69% return, which is significantly lower than ETL2.DE's 18.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SC04.DE has underperformed ETL2.DE with an annualized return of 4.39%, while ETL2.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


SC04.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-10.69%
6M
-10.59%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
4.39%

ETL2.DE

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.52%
YTD
18.23%
6M
18.72%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC04.DE
Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF
-10.69%7.57%7.08%8.48%-10.95%19.37%6.54%29.50%-16.18%13.26%
ETL2.DE
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
18.23%4.89%11.54%-9.44%24.86%46.17%-7.55%10.85%-4.21%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SC04.DE and ETL2.DE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.16

The correlation between SC04.DE and ETL2.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC04.DE
SC04.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SC04.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ETL2.DE
ETL2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC04.DEETL2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.33

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

3.59

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

8.20

-8.82

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC04.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC04.DE and ETL2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC04.DEETL2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

1.87

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.84

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.59

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.25

+0.32

Drawdowns

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC04.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.42%, smaller than the maximum ETL2.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC04.DE and ETL2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC04.DEETL2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.42%

-47.04%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-7.90%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-15.06%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-23.27%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.42%

-26.50%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.83%

-3.57%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-21.90%

+16.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

3.46%

+3.18%

Volatility

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) at 4.60%. This indicates that SC04.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETL2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC04.DEETL2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.60%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

12.74%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

15.15%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

15.44%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

13.69%

+3.28%

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC04.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC04.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC04.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC04.DE and ETL2.DE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC04.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC04.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

SC04.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ETL2.DE is Commodities. SC04.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Personal & Household Goods, while ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC04.DE and 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC04.DE and ETL2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer