SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SC02.DE (Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and XUFN.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) are both Financials Equities funds - SC02.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Financial Services while XUFN.DE tracks the MSCI USA Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SC02.DE returned 8.30%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for XUFN.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SC02.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUFN.DE.

Performance

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF (SC02.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC02.DE achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than XUFN.DE's -4.69% return.

SC02.DE

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 3.83%
• 3Y*: 16.32%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

XUFN.DE

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -2.06%
• 1Y: 1.90%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SC02.DE Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF	1.67%	9.93%	19.25%	27.60%	-20.74%	24.60%	6.09%	46.54%	-14.49%	4.06%
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	-4.69%	3.41%	38.69%	10.96%	-7.89%	49.37%	-12.55%	36.23%	-11.22%	14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SC02.DE and XUFN.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017	0.63

The correlation between SC02.DE and XUFN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC02.DE

SC02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 13
SC02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SC02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
SC02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SC02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SC02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

XUFN.DE

XUFN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF (SC02.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SC02.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.13	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	0.28	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.03	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	0.14	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.86	0.33	+0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC02.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC02.DE and XUFN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SC02.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	0.13	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.50	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.52	+0.03

Drawdowns

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC02.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.86%, roughly equal to the maximum XUFN.DE drawdown of -43.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC02.DE and XUFN.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SC02.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.86%	-43.39%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-13.24%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.17%	-23.03%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.68%	-23.03%	-6.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.42%	-9.49%	+6.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-7.81%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	5.77%	-1.31%

Volatility

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF (SC02.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that SC02.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUFN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SC02.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	4.40%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.72%	10.85%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	15.00%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.08%	18.60%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.65%	21.59%	-0.94%

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC02.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XUFN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SC02.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUFN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SC02.DE Invesco European Financials Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	1.15%	1.17%	1.08%	1.66%	2.69%	1.25%	1.34%	3.46%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SC02.DE and XUFN.DE in my portfolio?

SC02.DE and XUFN.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SC02.DE or XUFN.DE?

On fees, XUFN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SC02.DE or XUFN.DE?

XUFN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC02.DE.

What is the main difference between SC02.DE and XUFN.DE?

SC02.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Financial Services, while XUFN.DE tracks MSCI USA Financials. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC02.DE and 0.12% for XUFN.DE.