SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L
SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Invesco and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBUY.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.
Performance
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 13.06%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 6.48% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 8.43% | 25.36% | -9.32% | 10.44% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 18.55% | 3.44% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUY.L and XDEB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SBUY.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Energy
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Cyclical
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Industrials
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Technology
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Healthcare
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Communication Services
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Utilities
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Defensive
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Basic Materials
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Real Estate
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBUY.L
XDEB.L
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBUY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.06 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 0.41 | +4.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 1.14 | +15.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBUY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 0.33 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.66 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.69 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.78 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and XDEB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.91% | -19.61% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -6.39% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -8.47% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | -10.19% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -19.61% | -11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.52% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.50% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 2.32% | -0.83% |
Volatility
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) is 2.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that SBUY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 2.66% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | 5.97% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | 7.97% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 9.68% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 11.52% | +3.99% |
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBUY.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison
SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUY.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.
Find the right allocation for SBUY.L and XDEB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer