SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - SBUY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L returned 12.22%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for WNRG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBUY.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.

Performance

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SBUY.L is traded in GBp, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 12.22%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.

SBUY.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.45%
• 6M: 6.13%
• YTD: 9.04%
• 1Y: 21.94%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 12.22%

WNRG.L

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.20%
• 6M: 21.06%
• YTD: 27.93%
• 1Y: 37.02%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 21.10%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	9.04%	21.60%	14.64%	9.46%	-0.90%	21.36%	8.43%	25.36%	-9.32%	10.37%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	27.93%	6.65%	3.85%	-1.65%	64.04%	40.05%	-32.40%	5.71%	-9.95%	-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SBUY.L and WNRG.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between SBUY.L and WNRG.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBUY.L

SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

WNRG.L

WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBUY.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.71	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	2.19	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.31	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	2.23	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.67	5.81	+8.86

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBUY.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and WNRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBUY.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-59.34%	+21.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.79%	-16.52%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-21.66%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.76%	-22.11%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.91%	-59.34%	+28.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-10.03%	+9.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-12.66%	+4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	6.35%	-4.86%

Volatility

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) is 2.27%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that SBUY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBUY.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	6.42%	-4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.01%	18.68%	-11.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.79%	21.51%	-11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	23.88%	-10.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.34%	33.22%	-17.88%

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBUY.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	1.69%	1.86%	1.80%	1.73%	1.91%	1.20%	1.62%	1.90%	1.31%	1.16%	1.60%	1.27%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBUY.L and WNRG.L in my portfolio?

SBUY.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBUY.L or WNRG.L?

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBUY.L or WNRG.L?

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

What is the main difference between SBUY.L and WNRG.L?

SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.