PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBUY.L is traded in GBp, while IQSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IQSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.L's 14.53% return.


SBUY.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.68%
YTD
6.48%
6M
8.35%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.06%

IQSA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
6.30%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.75%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.48%21.60%14.64%9.46%-0.90%21.36%8.43%5.98%
IQSA.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
14.53%13.93%24.97%18.16%-3.78%26.14%6.97%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SBUY.L and IQSA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019

0.80

The correlation between SBUY.L and IQSA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBUY.L
IQSA.L

Financial Services

32.9%
21.2%

Energy

17.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
7.9%

Industrials

11.0%
13.3%

Technology

7.6%
33.0%

Healthcare

5.5%
7.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
11.3%

Utilities

2.2%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.7%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.3%

Financial Services

SBUY.L
32.9%
IQSA.L
21.2%

Energy

SBUY.L
17.1%
IQSA.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SBUY.L
15.8%
IQSA.L
7.9%

Industrials

SBUY.L
11.0%
IQSA.L
13.3%

Technology

SBUY.L
7.6%
IQSA.L
33.0%

Healthcare

SBUY.L
5.5%
IQSA.L
7.3%

Communication Services

SBUY.L
4.1%
IQSA.L
11.3%

Utilities

SBUY.L
2.2%
IQSA.L
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

SBUY.L
1.9%
IQSA.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

SBUY.L
1.4%
IQSA.L
3.7%

Real Estate

SBUY.L
0.5%
IQSA.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IQSA.L
IQSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBUY.LIQSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

4.96

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.93

19.21

-2.28

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBUY.L and IQSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBUY.LIQSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.50

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.88

-0.04

Drawdowns

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than IQSA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and IQSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBUY.LIQSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.91%

-26.59%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-6.45%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-19.19%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-19.19%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-3.25%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.67%

-0.18%

Volatility

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) is 2.32%, while Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that SBUY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBUY.LIQSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

3.99%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

9.96%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

12.80%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

15.33%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

17.00%

-1.49%

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Dividend Comparison

SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while IQSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQSA.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBUY.L and IQSA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQSA.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQSA.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.30% for IQSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBUY.L and IQSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer