SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L
SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) and IQSA.L (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco. SBUY.L is passively managed, while IQSA.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBUY.L returned 10.96%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for IQSA.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBUY.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQSA.L.
Performance
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBUY.L is traded in GBp, while IQSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IQSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.L's 14.53% return.
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
IQSA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 6.48% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 8.43% | 5.98% |
IQSA.L Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.53% | 13.93% | 24.97% | 18.16% | -3.78% | 26.14% | 6.97% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUY.L and IQSA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SBUY.L and IQSA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Energy
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Industrials
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Technology
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Healthcare
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Communication Services
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Utilities
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Consumer Defensive
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Basic Materials
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Real Estate
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBUY.L
IQSA.L
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBUY.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.96 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 19.21 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBUY.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.50 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.02 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than IQSA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and IQSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUY.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.91% | -26.59% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -6.45% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -19.19% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | -19.19% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.25% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.67% | -0.18% |
Volatility
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) is 2.32%, while Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that SBUY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUY.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 3.99% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | 9.96% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | 12.80% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 15.33% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 17.00% | -1.49% |
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBUY.L vs. IQSA.L - Dividend Comparison
SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while IQSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSA.L Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUY.L and IQSA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSA.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.30% for IQSA.L.
Find the right allocation for SBUY.L and IQSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer