SBT vs. NU
SBT (Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI)) and NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SBT in Banks - Regional, NU in Banks - Diversified.
Performance
SBT vs. NU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SBT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NU
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -16.06%
- YTD
- -28.49%
- 6M
- -28.32%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBT vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SBT Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) | 0.00% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -31.21% |
Fundamentals
SBT:
$13.59M
NU:
$17.54B
SBT:
$13.59M
NU:
$7.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBT vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank
SBT
NU
SBT vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) (SBT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.06 | — |
Drawdowns
SBT vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT and NU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -72.07% | +72.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.19% | +36.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -29.76% | +29.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.49% | — |
Volatility
SBT vs. NU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 38.92% | -38.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 58.44% | -58.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 58.44% | -58.44% |
Dividends
SBT vs. NU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBT nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SBT vs. NU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Find the right allocation for SBT and NU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer