SBT vs. NU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) (SBT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU).

Performance

SBT vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) (SBT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SBT vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SBT Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI)	0.00%
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.	-17.01%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) SBT : $13.59M NU : $15.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) SBT : $13.59M NU : $6.61B

Returns By Period

SBT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NU

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -13.74%
• 6M: -4.94%
• 1Y: 38.45%
• 3Y*: 44.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SBT vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU

NU Risk / Return Rank: 70
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (Southfield, MI) (SBT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBT	NU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.14	—

Dividends

SBT vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBT nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SBT vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT and NU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBT	NU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-72.07%	+72.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-23.03%	+23.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-29.90%	+29.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBT	NU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	39.97%	-39.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	59.12%	-59.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	59.12%	-59.12%

Financials