PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBND vs. SEMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBND vs. SEMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBND achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than SEMI's 30.58% return.


SBND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.54%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
10Y*

SEMI

1D
-1.16%
1M
12.74%
YTD
30.58%
6M
29.39%
1Y
61.64%
3Y*
30.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBND vs. SEMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SBND
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF
0.91%7.50%4.83%7.20%-3.17%
SEMI
Columbia Select Technology ETF
30.58%24.91%15.87%45.37%-21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SBND and SEMI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022

0.29

SBND vs. SEMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBND
SEMI

Financial Services

9.2%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

82.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SBND
9.2%
SEMI
4.4%

Basic Materials

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Communication Services

SBND

-

SEMI
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SBND

-

SEMI
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Energy

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Healthcare

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Industrials

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Real Estate

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Technology

SBND

-

SEMI
82.3%

Utilities

SBND

-

SEMI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBND vs. SEMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBND
SBND Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBND Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBND Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMI
SEMI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBND vs. SEMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBNDSEMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.30

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

16.13

-2.70

SBND vs. SEMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBND Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SEMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBND and SEMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBNDSEMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.80

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.64

+0.06

Drawdowns

SBND vs. SEMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBND drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum SEMI drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBND and SEMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBNDSEMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-32.93%

+22.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-14.41%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

-32.93%

+31.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.61%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-9.28%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

3.83%

-3.42%

Volatility

SBND vs. SEMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) is 0.58%, while Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that SBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBNDSEMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

7.06%

-6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

17.46%

-15.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

22.16%

-19.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.61%

31.57%

-27.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.61%

31.57%

-27.96%

SBND vs. SEMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBND vs. SEMI - Dividend Comparison

SBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than SEMI's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SBND
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF
4.53%4.65%4.58%3.90%2.80%0.43%
SEMI
Columbia Select Technology ETF
3.43%4.48%0.96%0.87%0.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBND and SEMI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMI has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to SBND (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBND dropped -10.78% vs SEMI's -32.93%.

On 3-year performance, SEMI leads with 30.40% vs 6.04% for SBND. On fees, SBND is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEMI has performed better with a 30.40% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBND is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SEMI.

SBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 3.43% for SEMI.

SBND is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SEMI is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SBND and 0.75% for SEMI.

SEMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBND and SEMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer