SBND vs. SDCP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SBND (Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF) and SDCP (Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. SBND is passively managed, while SDCP is actively managed. Over the past year, SBND returned 5.45% vs 4.16% for SDCP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDCP.

Performance

SBND vs. SDCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBND achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than SDCP's 1.14% return.

SBND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SDCP

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBND vs. SDCP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	0.91%	7.50%	4.83%	3.24%
SDCP Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF	1.14%	5.37%	5.24%	1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SBND and SDCP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.42

The correlation between SBND and SDCP shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SBND vs. SDCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBND

SBND Risk / Return Rank: 73
SBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SBND Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SBND Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SDCP

SDCP Risk / Return Rank: 90
SDCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SDCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SDCP Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SDCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SDCP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBND vs. SDCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBND	SDCP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.92	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	4.65	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.70	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	5.06	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	18.93	-5.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBND vs. SDCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBND Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SDCP Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBND and SDCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBND	SDCP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.92	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	2.68	-1.98

Drawdowns

SBND vs. SDCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBND drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, which is greater than SDCP's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBND and SDCP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBND	SDCP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-1.00%	-9.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-0.82%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.02%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-0.18%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.22%	+0.19%

Volatility

SBND vs. SDCP - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP) at 0.30%. This indicates that SBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBND	SDCP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.58%	0.30%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	0.84%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	1.46%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	2.04%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.61%	2.04%	+1.57%

SBND vs. SDCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBND vs. SDCP - Dividend Comparison

SBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than SDCP's 5.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	4.53%	4.65%	4.58%	3.90%	2.80%	0.43%
SDCP Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF	5.23%	5.16%	5.25%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBND and SDCP in my portfolio?

SBND and SDCP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBND or SDCP?

SBND has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to SDCP (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBND dropped -10.78% vs SDCP's -1.00%.

Which ETF is better, SBND or SDCP?

On 1-year performance, SBND leads with 5.45% vs 4.16% for SDCP. On fees, SBND is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SDCP has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SBND or SDCP?

Over the 1-year period, SBND has performed better with a 5.45% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBND or SDCP?

SBND is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBND or SDCP?

SDCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 4.53% for SBND.

What is the main difference between SBND and SDCP?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SBND and 0.35% for SDCP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.