PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIT vs. AETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SBIT vs. AETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SBIT vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
31.57%-25.11%-73.13%
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
-5.52%-0.11%-2.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 31.57% return, which is significantly higher than AETH's -5.52% return.


SBIT

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
31.57%
6M
111.14%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AETH

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-27.06%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SBIT vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AETH's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SBIT vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBITAETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.55

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

1.25

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

0.67

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

1.07

-1.31

SBIT vs. AETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the AETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIT and AETH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBITAETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.55

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.43

-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and AETH is -0.58. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SBIT vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than AETH's 2.55% yield.


TTM202520242023
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.42%0.52%1.00%0.00%
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.55%2.41%14.73%6.64%

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than AETH's maximum drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and AETH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SBITAETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-47.78%

-43.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.11%

-41.40%

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.12%

-41.19%

-37.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.28%

-23.51%

-43.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.12%

25.81%

+21.31%

Volatility

SBIT vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 26.24% compared to Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) at 18.61%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SBITAETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.24%

18.61%

+7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.98%

28.66%

+44.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.40%

51.00%

+39.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.58%

56.15%

+43.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.58%

56.15%

+43.43%