PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBIO.L is traded in USD, while XSHC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSHC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIO.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than XSHC.L's -2.54% return.


SBIO.L

1D
3.10%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
4.34%
6M
3.70%
1Y
41.44%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
7.49%

XSHC.L

1D
3.03%
1M
4.16%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SBIO.L
Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF
4.34%32.89%-2.00%6.14%-11.85%-0.49%27.35%25.54%-9.10%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
-2.54%14.90%2.35%1.51%-3.42%26.97%13.34%21.40%4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIO.L and XSHC.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.66

The correlation between SBIO.L and XSHC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBIO.L
XSHC.L

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

SBIO.L
100.0%
XSHC.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Communication Services

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Energy

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Financial Services

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Industrials

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Real Estate

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Technology

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Utilities

SBIO.L

-

XSHC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIO.L
SBIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SBIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XSHC.L
XSHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBIO.LXSHC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

1.33

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.56

3.26

+13.30

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIO.L and XSHC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBIO.LXSHC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

0.98

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.37

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.57

-0.30

Drawdowns

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIO.L drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than XSHC.L's maximum drawdown of -26.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO.L and XSHC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBIO.LXSHC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.44%

-26.83%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-10.92%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.88%

-17.41%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.33%

-17.41%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-5.05%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-5.01%

-11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.46%

-1.97%

Volatility

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that SBIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBIO.LXSHC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

4.88%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.27%

10.73%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

14.82%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

14.73%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

16.27%

+5.96%

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIO.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Dividend Comparison

SBIO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SBIO.L
Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
1.28%1.25%1.25%1.23%1.55%0.85%1.12%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIO.L and XSHC.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SBIO.L.

SBIO.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while XSHC.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SBIO.L and 0.12% for XSHC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIO.L and XSHC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer