SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L
SBIO.L (Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF) and XSHC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - SBIO.L tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD while XSHC.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBIO.L returned 4.66%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for XSHC.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBIO.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSHC.L.
Performance
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBIO.L is traded in USD, while XSHC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSHC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIO.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than XSHC.L's -2.54% return.
SBIO.L
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- 1Y
- 41.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
XSHC.L
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIO.L Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF | 4.34% | 32.89% | -2.00% | 6.14% | -11.85% | -0.49% | 27.35% | 25.54% | -9.10% |
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | -2.54% | 14.90% | 2.35% | 1.51% | -3.42% | 26.97% | 13.34% | 21.40% | 4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIO.L and XSHC.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SBIO.L and XSHC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SBIO.L
XSHC.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
SBIO.L
XSHC.L
Basic Materials
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Communication Services
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Energy
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Financial Services
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Industrials
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Real Estate
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Technology
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Utilities
SBIO.L
-
XSHC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBIO.L
XSHC.L
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIO.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 1.33 | +4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.56 | 3.26 | +13.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIO.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.98 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.37 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.57 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIO.L drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than XSHC.L's maximum drawdown of -26.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO.L and XSHC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIO.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -26.83% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -10.92% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.88% | -17.41% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.33% | -17.41% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -5.05% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.83% | -5.01% | -11.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 4.46% | -1.97% |
Volatility
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that SBIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIO.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 4.88% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 10.73% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 14.82% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 14.73% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 16.27% | +5.96% |
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIO.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBIO.L vs. XSHC.L - Dividend Comparison
SBIO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIO.L Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIO.L and XSHC.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SBIO.L.
SBIO.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while XSHC.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SBIO.L and 0.12% for XSHC.L.
Find the right allocation for SBIO.L and XSHC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer