SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SBIO.L (Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF) and HLTW.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - SBIO.L tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD while HLTW.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBIO.L returned 7.49%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for HLTW.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBIO.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HLTW.L.

Performance

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIO.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than HLTW.L's -3.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SBIO.L having a 7.49% annualized return and HLTW.L not far ahead at 7.69%.

SBIO.L

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 41.44%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 7.49%

HLTW.L

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: -3.12%
• 6M: -1.75%
• 1Y: 11.48%
• 3Y*: 5.29%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBIO.L Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF	4.34%	32.89%	-2.00%	6.14%	-11.85%	-0.49%	27.35%	25.54%	-11.34%	21.45%
HLTW.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD	-3.12%	15.73%	0.39%	3.08%	-5.66%	20.58%	12.94%	22.85%	1.54%	20.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIO.L and HLTW.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014	0.74

The correlation between SBIO.L and HLTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIO.L

SBIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
SBIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SBIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SBIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SBIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SBIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

HLTW.L

HLTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HLTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
HLTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HLTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
HLTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBIO.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	0.79	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.30	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.15	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.38	1.14	+4.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.56	2.84	+13.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIO.L and HLTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBIO.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	0.79	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.30	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.52	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.75	-0.49

Drawdowns

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIO.L drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than HLTW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO.L and HLTW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIO.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-26.58%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-10.12%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.88%	-19.19%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.33%	-19.19%	-19.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.33%	-26.58%	-11.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-5.90%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.83%	-5.20%	-11.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	4.06%	-1.57%

Volatility

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (SBIO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L) at 4.82%. This indicates that SBIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBIO.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	4.82%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.27%	10.63%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	14.52%	+5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.21%	14.16%	+7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	14.85%	+7.38%

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIO.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HLTW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIO.L vs. HLTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBIO.L nor HLTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIO.L and HLTW.L in my portfolio?

SBIO.L and HLTW.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIO.L or HLTW.L?

On fees, HLTW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIO.L or HLTW.L?

HLTW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SBIO.L.

What is the main difference between SBIO.L and HLTW.L?

SBIO.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while HLTW.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SBIO.L and 0.30% for HLTW.L.