PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBGSF vs. QCI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSF) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBGSF is traded in USD, while QCI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QCI.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBGSF achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than QCI.DE's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SBGSF has outperformed QCI.DE with an annualized return of 22.86%, while QCI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.50% annualized return.


SBGSF

1D
-0.17%
1M
-10.62%
6M
11.74%
YTD
10.89%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
16.99%
10Y*
22.86%
ALL TIME*
7.50%

QCI.DE

1D
3.99%
1M
-23.55%
6M
11.01%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
14.50%
ALL TIME*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBGSF
Schneider Electric S.E.
10.89%13.58%26.32%50.15%-26.06%64.38%47.24%56.42%-18.39%26.54%
QCI.DE
QUALCOMM Incorporated
0.29%14.63%8.80%37.18%-40.10%27.76%73.21%64.20%-8.70%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SBGSF and QCI.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.21

The correlation between SBGSF and QCI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBGSF
SBGSF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SBGSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBGSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBGSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SBGSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBGSF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QCI.DE
QCI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QCI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QCI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSF) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBGSFQCI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.41

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

0.82

+0.35

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBGSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the QCI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBGSF and QCI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBGSF drawdown since its inception was -71.65%, which is greater than QCI.DE's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBGSF and QCI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBGSFQCI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.65%

-46.32%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-34.63%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.69%

-45.00%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.95%

-45.72%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-45.72%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

-30.98%

+20.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-19.72%

-11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.34%

17.34%

-9.00%

Volatility

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSF) is 12.26%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCI.DE) has a volatility of 19.11%. This indicates that SBGSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBGSFQCI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.26%

19.11%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.45%

49.26%

-15.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.79%

54.97%

-12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.12%

40.16%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.56%

39.74%

-4.18%

Dividends

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Dividend Comparison

SBGSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than QCI.DE's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCI.DE
QUALCOMM Incorporated
2.05%2.06%2.21%2.39%2.87%1.63%2.12%3.13%4.94%4.17%3.32%3.97%
SBGSF
Schneider Electric S.E.
1.65%3.17%1.51%3.44%4.32%12.49%3.94%2.56%4.23%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SBGSF vs. QCI.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schneider Electric S.E. and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBGSF and QCI.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBGSF and QCI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer